Aparna Bhat v. State of Madhya Pradesh is a landmark case which unveiled the gender stereotypes prevalent in judicial process and its consequences on the rights of women and marginalized communities. The case involves a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by Aparna Bhat, a social activist and lawyer, in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The petition seeks justice for survivors of sexual violence and accountability for state authorities in cases of sexual assault and harassment. The case brought to the forefront the failures and shortcomings within the criminal justice system in combating gender-based violences. It emphasised the necessity of legal reforms and mechanisms to ensure the effective prosecution of culprits, as well as the protection and empowerment of victims. Further, the case underlined the intersectionality of gender-based violence with other forms of discriminations such as caste, class, and socio-economic status. It highlighted the importance of espousing an intersectional feminist lens in addressing inequalities and supporting the rights of all marginalized groups.
Ultimately, Aparna Bhat v. State of Madhya Pradesh contributes to the ongoing battle for gender equality and social justice in Indian society. It serves as a poignant reminder of the encounters that women face in accessing justice and to uphold their dignity.
| Citation | 2021 SCC OnLine SC 230 |
| Name of the Court which decided the case | Supreme Court of India |
| Bench | A.M. Khanwilkar and S. Ravindra Bhat |
| Legislations | Constitution of India, Indian Penal Code 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Information Technology Act, 2000. |